In an amazing turn of events, Kim Davis, the Rowan County Kentucky Clerk met with the pope for 10 minutes. For those that do not know who Kim Davis is. She defied the homosexuals that were looking for a marriage license. She denied them and a couple of heterosexual couples.
The Supreme Court allowed the 6th Circuit court decision to stand and she was order to jail in contempt of court for not issuing marriage licenses to homosexuals. We still contend the fact that there was no law passed by Congress that gives homosexuals the right to marry because there is no amendment or clause that specifically address marriage, whether heterosexual or homosexual. The 10th Amendment was made to address laws made by the states.
We also contend that the 14th Amendment, “Equal Protection” clause was about giving blacks rights. And thus, the Civil Rights amendments was birth for this purpose. Kentucky has no laws stating that a clerk MUST give homosexuals marriage certificates. Kentucky doesn’t have any laws giving homosexuals the right to marry. Hence, Kim Davis’ civil Christian disobedience to a law that doesn’t exist was the right call.
Homosexuality and homosexual marriage is not the law of the land. Therefore, how can you be disobedient to a law that doesn’t exist?
How can she be in contempt of court to a law that doesn’t exist?
Contempt of a federal judge?
Judges, presidents, governors, mayors, and county executives cannot make laws.
Last we’ve checked, Congress and the Kentucky legislature (not judges or presidents, or governors) never wrote a law. The only legal body authorized to write and pass laws is Congress and the states. Veto power is held only by the governor in the states and the president of the United States. Kim Davis was freed and the FRC along with governor Mike Huckabee, a 2016 presidential candidate, celebrated outside the place where she was incarcerated.
Since then, she has allowed the issuance of marriage certificates to homosexuals but without her name.
The certificates are issued as “pursuant to federal court order.”
She has since changed her political party affiliation from Democrat to Republican. But in another twist of events, she met with the pope.
There is no question in my mind that this meeting with the pope smells.
Here is the reason.
Preponderance of evidence. The Family Research Council led by Tony Perkins is not afraid to be inclusive of catholics to achieve a common goal. I believe that it’s part of a system of numbers and unity. There is no question that FRC has been leading the charge against tyranny in the United States, watching our freedoms slip away is a clear and present danger to the United States, but a much bigger threat than this has vicious spiritual ramifications.
There is no possibility of the Body of Christ coming together with clear doctrinal differences. We are so fragmented that the devil is laughing at our divisiveness.
Jesus said it clearly that a house divided against itself cannot stand (see Matthew 12:25).
You see, it is not about people but the people involved in the system.
There are beautiful catholics as well as there are beautiful protestants but when you honor the denomination above the Lord, that’s where the problem is. There are just as much hideous stuff that goes on in the protestant churches. Trouble is abiding also in non denominational churches with questionable doctrine (prosperity gospel and so forth).
However, we must never unite in compromise. The purity of the Bible and the common correct interpretation of Scripture is what we should fight for before we fight for causes that threaten a nation. The world sees several denominations made by man. As confusing as it looks, this is not the true Body of Christ. Doctrine has hacked up the Body where our body pieces are all over the place like a car bomb explosion.
That’s why Jesus shared about wheat and tares. Tares looks so close like wheat that the only time it becomes distinguishable is when you uproot them.
It is not uncommon for catholics to meet with protestants. But we should never meet to suppress the truth of the Scriptures. Neither should there be a meeting where hypocritical living is evident. You can’t demand that the world get born again if you are not born again yourself.
This is something that many leaders in catholicism is pressing for. For protestants to stop protesting the wrongly divided doctrine held by the system of catholicism. Therefore, it is uncommon for believers in the Lord Jesus to mix it up with a denomination (catholicism) holding questionable doctrine.
Many will say that protestants and catholics need to come together. Many will say that I am being divisive.
I beg to differ because of extreme doctrinal differences.
We must remember that Martin Luther, John Wycliffe, William Tyndale, and others vehemently protested catholicism’s monopoly on the Bible.
Many Christians tend to forget that these men were brutally persecuted for their stand against a system that held many people in bondage to an institution.
Note well Ephesians 4:4-6 “There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called in one hope of your calling; one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.”
If you are looking at major doctrinal differences, just look in three places.
- We do not pray to Mary, the mother of Jesus.
Matthew 6:6-7 “But you, when you pray, go into your room, and when you have shut your door, pray to your Father who is in the secret place; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you openly. And when you pray, do not use vain repetitions as the heathen do. For they think that they will be heard for their many words.”
A “vain repetition or (a proverbial stammerer)” is defined as to “repeat the same things over and over, to use many idle words, to babble, prate.” In other words, you use words over and over again as an act of religiosity with no real purpose. It is a form of godliness that denies God’s power. Such prayers as “Hail Mary, full of grace….” Well John 1:14 says “And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.” Jesus is “full of grace and truth…” not Mary.
John 16:23-24 says “And in that day you will ask Me nothing. Most assuredly, I say to you, whatever you ask the Father in My name He will give you. Until now you have asked nothing in My name. Ask, and you will receive, that your joy may be full.”
No where in the Scriptures were we instructed by the Lord Jesus to pray to Mary.
2. We do not pray to “patron saints.”
From a good source, it is defined as “A patron saint or a patron hallow is a saint who in Roman Catholicism is regarded as the tutelary (familiar) spirit or heavenly advocate of a nation, place, craft, activity, class, clan, family or person. Supposedly, patron saints, having already transcended to the metaphysical, are able to intercede effectively for the needs of their special charges.”
John 14:6 says, “Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.”
John 16:23-24 says “And in that day you will ask Me nothing. Most assuredly, I say to you, whatever you ask the Father in My name He will give you. Until now you have asked nothing in My name. Ask, and you will receive, that your joy may be full.”
Hebrews 7:25 says “Therefore He is also able to save to the uttermost those who come to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them.”
Romans 8:34 says “Who is he who condemns? It is Christ who died, and furthermore is also risen, who is even at the right hand of God, who also makes intercession for us.”
1 Timothy 2:5 says “For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus,”
1 John 2:1-2 says “My little children, these things I write to you, so that you may not sin. And if anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous. And He Himself is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the whole world.”
So ONLY Jesus is The Way, The Intercessor, The Mediator, The Advocate.
Therefore, no where in the Scriptures were we instructed by the Lord Jesus to pray to patron saints.
3. The pope is not the head of the church, Jesus is.
Ephesians 1:20-23 says “…which He worked in Christ when He raised Him from the dead and seated Him at His right hand in the heavenly places, far above all principality and power and might and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age but also in that which is to come. And He put all things under His feet, and gave Him to be head over all things to the church, which is His body, the fullness of Him who fills all in all.”
Colossians 1:15-20 says “He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist. And He is the head of the body, the church, who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in all things He may have the preeminence. For it pleased the Father that in Him all the fullness should dwell, and by Him to reconcile all things to Himself, by Him, whether things on earth or things in heaven, having made peace through the blood of His cross.”
The pope may be the head of catholicism, but he is not the Head of the Church.
Therefore, no where in the Scriptures are we instructed that we have another head other than Christ.
It is true that when one is called to the ministry, they represent the ministry of Jesus Christ according to Ephesians 4:11, but as believers, we serve in this capacity as well according to 2 Corinthians 5:20-21.
These Scriptures that were quoted is the work of William Tyndale, John Wycliffe and other heroes when they translated the Bible into english from the Latin Vulgate, Greek & Hebrew, and other sources. We have our own copies of what the Word of God says as opposed to taking it for granted the catholic priests were giving their own versions of misinterpreted Scriptures and self conjured religious sayings, lacking Biblical harmony.
So having said this, why would Kim Davis sit with the pope? I honestly believe that it was a set up. I could be wrong about how and who is behind this, but it doesn’t look right and it isn’t right and we know it.
I do not agree with it one bit. Some will ask the question, “What’s the harm?”
The harm is looking to man for help instead of God.
Psalm 121 says
1 I will lift up my eyes to the hills —
From whence comes my help?
2 My help comes from the Lord,
Who made heaven and earth.
3 He will not allow your foot to be moved;
He who keeps you will not slumber.
4 Behold, He who keeps Israel
Shall neither slumber nor sleep.
5 The Lord is your keeper;
The Lord is your shade at your right hand.
6 The sun shall not strike you by day,
Nor the moon by night.
7 The Lord shall preserve you from all evil;
He shall preserve your soul.
8 The Lord shall preserve your going out and your coming in
From this time forth, and even forevermore.
So should catholics and protestant stay apart or unify?
With clear doctrinal differences, there is no question about it. Until the system of catholicism is renounced, and these, and other major doctrinal differences are dealt with, it is best to be loyal to God and His uncompromising Word as opposed to being loyal to a system that is against the Scriptures.
The article regarding Kim Davis meeting the pope could be read here.
There is no need to elongate this second rebuttal to EXMInistries.
Lonnie Poindexter, of Freedom’s Journal Radio Show, corrected me about a recent resignation that took place of a clerk due to her religions faith regarding issuing marriage licenses to homosexuals.
In a nutshell, Brother Lonnie said to me that if the righteous resigns, we leave a vacuum open for evil to assume office. That this is exactly what the devil wants. Righteousness to vacate. This was in response to a post on FB, that I commended the stand on Biblical truth but I never commended the resignation.
Lonnie Poindexter’s point was well noted and received. He is correct to point out that if the righteous walk away, the darkness moves in without a fight.
This is called by my fellow abortion abolitionists (Abolishhumanabortion.com) “Righteous resistance to evil authorities.” Acts 5:29.
In fact, the post, if I remember correctly, included the link to a story about a clerk resigning and EXMInistries concurring with this resignation. That this is what’s supposed to happen.
This is what EXMinistries and others supporting resignations want. For Christians to resign.
Then in using a Scripture that some of us may be familiar with (see Matthew 22:15-22)….“Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s….” we see that Scripture twisting is the norm, even for believers that should know well their Bibles. The issue was about money. “Who’s inscription is this Jesus asked,” Caesar’s inscription was on the coin. The question was about Jews paying tax to Caesar. This ties in succinctly with Romans 13. Romans 13 is the concurring Scripture regarding taxes, not homosexuality.
Nice try, by the way, to twist this Scripture.
But now, what about homosexuality? Is there a law that specifically states that “homosexuality is the law of the land?”
The answer is simple.
There is none.
So Caesar can’t get what Caesar wants because there is no law of the land.
I find it very hard to believe that people can’t grasp this simple statement, but then again, I shouldn’t be surprised because these are the last days and some of us didn’t get the memo.
From a Constitutional perspective, there is no law in the Constitution regarding same sex marriage. The 10th Amendment is clear that any law, according to governor Mike Huckabee and senator Ted Cruz, and other Constitutional scholars/attorneys, that there is no specific law in the Constitution governing marriage and that such laws are to be given by the states. That’s the 10th Amendment.
School Prayer, Abortion, and now, Same Sex Marriage has all been “phantom law” on the misapplied 14th Amendment “Equal Protection” Clause. The original intent of the 14th Amendment was about race.
According to the 10th Amendment, states govern the laws regarding marriage.
Kentucky has no laws on homosexual marriage, and the Constitution has no laws on marriage. Plain and simple.
So the question is very simple.
“What law (of “Caesar”), if any, did Kim Davis break, whether Constitution or Kentucky law that specifically stated that a clerk MUST issue a marriage license to homosexuals?
If a law was created by the U.S. Congress and or Kentucky legislature, please state that law so”Caesar” can be served.
All I am saying is that if there is no law, then Kim Davis was unlawfully imprisoned for a law that doesn’t exist. Secondly, the Supreme Court has no way to enforce the law but leaves that up to the lower circuit or county courts. What we are saying is that there is a clear usurping of the Constitutional process of establishing laws to create a law that doesn’t exist. In other words, Genesis 3:1-7 just happened all over again and we didn’t pay attention.
If Kentucky had a law on the books regarding SSM, then this is a “gotcha” moment, but there is no law.
We can cut to the chase by answering this question mentioned above.
Romans 13 is clear that all authority comes from God.
So you mean to tell me that we are to obey a law from man about the sin of homosexuality? Then that means that God has to raise from the dead all those that commit sexual immorality, including the ones that were destroyed in Sodom and Gomorrah, and apologize to them.
NO need to go any further than this. Answer these questions, citing a law or laws that legalized homosexual marriage, and then we can move on.
Until then, if you want to continue being blinded by the world’s version of the greatest hijacking of law in history, by all means, go ahead.
Just ask me for a pillow when you hit the bottom of the ditch.
The YouTube video posted by EXMinistries can be seen here.
There is an interesting article from one of the most powerful ministries that was posted on my FB comment.
EXMinistries has been on the cutting edge of uncovering the secrets behind HIP HOP music. In particular Christian HIP HOP and other areas, such as The Illuminati, Greek Letter Sororities, Freemasonry, Catholicism, Thieves In The Temple regarding praise and worship “artists,” and other areas as it relates to the conduct of Black people, & pastors in our churches today.
We are grateful for their insights to help us understand how demonic activity has invaded some segments of the Christian church.
The last thing that we need is for Christians to disagree. However, we are aware that disagreements is part of the territory.
In their latest article regarding “Christian Disobedience?,” I do have to share a word that will rebut EXMinistries’ article.
However, before you read my rebuttal, EXMinistries‘ article could be read here.
Having just read the article, I disagree. I believe that we are to be law abiding citizens but not when there is a blatant law against following the Word of God.
And we should never follow a law where a law doesn’t exist.
Here is why.
1. Kim Davis did follow the law.
She is an elected official that followed the law to the letter. There is no law specifically ordering a clerk to issue a marriage license to homosexuals.
1. The U.S. Constitution has nothing to say on marriage between one man and one woman.
2. There is no law in the U.S. Constitution authorizing homosexual marriage. Therefore, there is no law on homosexual marriage for the Supreme Court to rule on.
3. Kentucky law has nothing to say about ordering the clerk to issue a license to homosexuals.
4. There is no law in Kentucky authorizing homosexual marriage.
Here is the law in Kentucky.
402.005 Definition of marriage. As used and recognized in the law of the Commonwealth, “marriage” refers only to the civil status, condition, or relation of one (1) man and one (1) woman united in law for life, for the discharge to each other and the community of the duties legally incumbent upon those whose association is founded on the distinction of sex. Effective: July 15, 1998 History: Created 1998 Ky. Acts ch. 258, sec. 4, effective July 15, 1998.
2. 5 Justices hijacked the 14th Amendment.
What is the purpose of the 14th Amendment?
Here is the 14th Amendment.
14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in a nut shell.
The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868, and granted citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” which included former slaves recently freed. In addition, it forbids states from denying any person “life, liberty or property, without due process of law” or to “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” By directly mentioning the role of the states, the 14th Amendment greatly expanded the protection of civil rights to all Americans and is cited in more litigation than any other amendment.
The Equal Protection clause is about equal treatment of races, not sex or as they would put it “sexual orientation.”
The Supreme Court case of Obergefell v. Hodges is about homosexual marriage certificates being honored irrespective of States’ laws on marriage. That homosexual marriages are to be honored on the same level as heterosexuals.
Hence, marriage equality.
In other words, to accomplish equality, they must suppress the ageless institution of marriage between one man and one woman as inerrantly given by God as taught in the timeless infallible Word of God.
Because certain states have laws on the books that prohibit homosexual marriage and the elite leaders of homosexuality knew that this is a major problem in their pursuit of dominance and control in the United States.
We all know that this homosexual agenda is a clear and present danger to the United States.
How is it a danger?
1. Homosexual marriage re-writes the rules of traditional Biblical marriage as we know it.
2. It is a danger to Christians practicing their faith which brings the convicting power of the gospel.
We must remember Paul’s word in 2 Corinthians 2:14-16.
“Now thanks be to God who always leads us in triumph in Christ, and through us diffuses the fragrance of His knowledge in every place. For we are to God the fragrance of Christ among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing. To the one we are the aroma of death leading to death, and to the other the aroma of life leading to life.”
They are trying to stop this aroma for a long time.
In essence, what 5 justices have accomplished is to give practicing homosexuals a race status by invoking the power of the 14th Amendment.
Homosexuality is not a race.
Homosexuality is a sin.
Homosexuals are not a race.
Homosexuals are people that practice the vile, disgusting, and nasty sin of homosexuality.
This propels polygamy into a race status. This propels pedophilia into a race status. This propels zoophilia into a race status, equally protected by the law.
The moment sin is legal, it brings every illegality into the status of the 14th Amendment. Equal Protection.
Man did not make up marriage. Marriage is the ageless institution from God to one man and one woman.
The argument of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” is a flawed argument for well known monumental reasons.
What the world is telling the child of God to do is when you come to work, leave Jesus and His standards at the door. You are not permitted to live by your Bible.
You are commanded to live by our rules irrespective of your conscience. Respect our rules and laws while we disrespect your moral conscience and God’s law.
The 1st Amendment gives us this protection against governmental tyranny.
Here is the 1st Amendment.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
“Prohibiting the free exercise thereof” is what Judge Bunning did to Kim Davis.
In essence, because there is no law stating that a clerk MUST give a license to homosexuals, the judge legislated from the bench, stating that this is the law of the land, where there is no law made by Congress, and incarcerated Kim Davis for contempt of court. This intimidation tactic was designed to suppress her right to exercise her religious objection to issue a marriage license to practicing homosexuals.
Homosexuality is condemned by God in the Scriptures and there is no need to run references with the exception of Leviticus 18:22 and Romans 1:18-32.
We must also remember the Civil Rights movement was born out of civil disobedience to laws that were already in the books in the states.
Again, I remind you that there is no law in the books regarding homosexual marriage in the U.S. Constitution or Kentucky law, but in the Civil Rights movement, civil disobedience was warranted because there were laws in the books. Hence, the Civil Rights laws were created by the only law making body in the United States.
So how can Kim Davis be illegally tried and unlawfully incarcerated for a law that doesn’t exist?
It’s judicial tyranny.
Finally, the “law of the land” argument is a “phantom law” argument.
Congress can draft and make laws. Not any judge and not the president.
There is no “law of the land” made by Congress for homosexual marriage to be legal in the United States.
Kim Davis did her job and she is to be commended for civil disobedience to a law that doesn’t exist.
I can understand the intent behind “Christian Disobedience.”
Lately BLM (Black Lives Matters) has been approving the killing of police officers, unlawful uprisings to destroy property, and other vicious forms of destruction to make a point.
With the Kim Davis incident, there is no comparison.
She did what Acts 5:29 says, “We rather obey God than man.”
Romans 13 teaches every born again believer to follow the laws of God’s appointed ministers that oversee the orderly activities of man. When the laws of man conflict with the Word of God, we cannot uphold, support, or obey a law of man that clearly violate the Scriptures. Even if it means losing our job, incarceration, or death.
In the 1600’s the puritans came from England to America to avoid religious persecution.
Now this persecution is about to engulf this once great land where freedom was sought. We do not pay enough attention to why they came. We are only interested in turning this once great nation into a land of immorality. For this to happen, morality must now be a thing of the past and anyone that says anything about God or the Bible must be snuffed out.
This only brings the wrath of God on this nation. As Christians, we must guard ourselves from anything that demands the suppression of the right to exercise what we believe in the Word of God.
God would never instruct us to disobey Him and obey the devil. And God would never instruct us to disobey man’s law that is in harmony with God’s Word.
Again, it is not lawful or right to tell Kim Davis to quit her job because she did her job in accordance with the law. As Kim Davis said, she was voted in as an elected official. Only the people that voted her in can vote her out. The judge has taken a page out of persecution, we respond according to Matthew 5:43-48. But we also respond by honoring God and His Word above man’s unjust laws.
We must also remember that the children of Israel perverted justice and changed the commandment of God by upholding their traditions. For this, they are severely judged, even to this day.
Until there is a specific law stating very clearly that a clerk MUST issue a marriage license to homosexuals, and until there is a change in the law from the Kentucky legislators of 402.005 Definition of marriage, civil disobedience is a page out of Acts 5:29 and commendable of the greatest Civil Rights struggle in US history.
We must remember that homosexuals are also liars in accordance with John 8:44.
They will go to great lengths to get a child of God to compromise. It is best to err on the side of the Word of God against the sin of homosexuality than to accommodate the sin of homosexuality.
Man’s temporary persecution is far better than God’s hot displeasure.
We have to keep our eyes on two fronts.
The Kim Davis incident in Kentucky challenged our right to exercise Christianity in the United States. For the first time, an activist judge incarcerated a believer in the Lord Jesus Christ for practicing her faith.
Just for standing up to the elite homosexual agenda to legitimize the sin of homosexuality by hijacking the 14th Amendment. This is a blatant attempt to “racialize” the sin of homosexuality.
Well, they’ve been at it for years and now, because of a dual hijacking of the Civil Rights and the 14th Amendment that was clearly meant to establish rights for Black people, all of a sudden, they feel “giddy” to call themselves a race of people that feel unequal.
Just imagine that white homosexuals and some self imposed disenfranchised black homosexuals, and other “Americans” feeling unequal in their own country.
SO now we have to call them “Homosexual Americans” just like Italian Americans, African Americans, Jamaican Americans, Haitian Americans, Japanese Americans……and the list goes on.
Why not start a “Polygamist American” movement. “Prostitution American, Adulterer American, Fornicatorian American, Zoophilian American”….the list goes on.
And if this doesn’t take the cake…..Homosexual Americans have a voice in Shepard Smith of Fox News.
People are so deceived that they compare giving rights to interracial couples to get married to homosexuals getting rights to get married.
As far as interracial couples are concerned, it’s male and female, of different races.
So why compare that to two men and two women looking to legitimize the sin of homosexuality?
Can you see the lunacy in this?
Let’s take a look at interracial marriage and the law.
The case was called “Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), is a landmark civil rights decision of the United States Supreme Court, which invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage.
The case was brought by Mildred Loving, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, who had been sentenced to a year in prison in Virginia for marrying each other.
Their marriage violated the state’s anti-miscegenation statute, the Racial Integrity Act of 1924, which prohibited marriage between people classified as “white” and people classified as “colored”.
The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision determined that this prohibition was unconstitutional, reversing Pace v. Alabama (1883) and ending all race-based legal restrictions on marriage in the United States.”
So now, interracial marriage between one man and one woman is considered to be similar by the elite of homosexuality to same sex people getting married?
How delusional has this nation driven by 3% of the American population became?
As I have said, homosexuality is a sin, not a race.
So sexual preferences in made out to be a race or class of people?
Sad country we live in.
The Shepard Smith story could be read here.
The second front is Planned Murderhood.
Since the Kim Davis unlawful imprisonment drew our attention away from the continued slaughter of innocent children, and now for body parts, we need to have the same kind of response for our neighbors in the womb. Thing is, I don’t think there is the will to muster the courage, response, and aggressive action to address this issue as we did for Kim.
Abortion is entrenched in the churches we worship. The church can muster courage for the stand against homosexuality, but we lag in zeal and drag our feet to protect the children in the womb.
Abortion’s fuel is lust, carried out in adultery and fornication.
Thousands of Americans are killed in the womb. Approximately 3500 Americans are killed everyday. These innocent children did not commit a crime. A male and a female decided to commit adultery or fornication. They could afford to sin sexually but they have determined that they could not afford to have this child that they’ve conceived.
Even worse, in the prostitution industry, working females get pregnant and then abort the child and return to work. The “Johns” are culpable of adultery/fornication and murder.
The harlotry and bloodshed in the land, and the harvesting of parts of sacrificed unwanted children is ever before the Heavenly Father. Their blood cried out for justice since 1973.
There is no question in my mind that the sacrifice to Molech will not go unpunished. Sexual sins carry a steep price and the Lord will exact His vengeance upon this nation for the cry of their blood will not go unheeded.
For true revival to hit this nation, there must be sustained Christian aggression in both areas. We can get giddy about the release of Kim Davis, and it is no small feat. But if we drop the ball on the unborn, God is looking at us and He is not wondering. He is demanding that we put forth the same effort across the board.
If we don’t, it is hypocritical.