Rebuttal To EXMinistries Regarding Kim Davis’ Civil Disobedience

Unknown

There is an interesting article from one of the most powerful ministries that was posted on my FB comment.

EXMinistries has been on the cutting edge of uncovering the secrets behind HIP HOP music. In particular Christian HIP HOP and other areas, such as The Illuminati, Greek Letter Sororities, Freemasonry, Catholicism, Thieves In The Temple regarding praise and worship “artists,” and other areas as it relates to the conduct of Black people, & pastors in our churches today.

We are grateful for their insights to help us understand how demonic activity has invaded some segments of the Christian church.

The last thing that we need is for Christians to disagree. However, we are aware that disagreements is part of the territory.

In their latest article regarding “Christian Disobedience?,” I do have to share a word that will rebut EXMinistries’ article.

However, before you read my rebuttal, EXMinistries‘ article could be read here.

Having just read the article, I disagree. I believe that we are to be law abiding citizens but not when there is a blatant law against following the Word of God.

And we should never follow a law where a law doesn’t exist.

Here is why.

1. Kim Davis did follow the law.

She is an elected official that followed the law to the letter. There is no law specifically ordering a clerk to issue a marriage license to homosexuals. 

1. The U.S. Constitution has nothing to say on marriage between one man and one woman. 

2. There is no law in the U.S. Constitution authorizing homosexual marriage. Therefore, there is no law on homosexual marriage for the Supreme Court to rule on.

3. Kentucky law has nothing to say about ordering the clerk to issue a license to homosexuals.

4. There is no law in Kentucky authorizing homosexual marriage.

WHY?

Here is the law in Kentucky.

402.005 Definition of marriage. As used and recognized in the law of the Commonwealth, “marriage” refers only to the civil status, condition, or relation of one (1) man and one (1) woman united in law for life, for the discharge to each other and the community of the duties legally incumbent upon those whose association is founded on the distinction of sex. Effective: July 15, 1998 History: Created 1998 Ky. Acts ch. 258, sec. 4, effective July 15, 1998.

2. 5 Justices hijacked the 14th Amendment.

What is the purpose of the 14th Amendment?

Here is the 14th Amendment.

14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in a nut shell.

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868, and granted citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” which included former slaves recently freed. In addition, it forbids states from denying any person “life, liberty or property, without due process of law” or to “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” By directly mentioning the role of the states, the 14th Amendment greatly expanded the protection of civil rights to all Americans and is cited in more litigation than any other amendment.

The Equal Protection clause is about equal treatment of races, not sex or as they would put it “sexual orientation.”

The Supreme Court case of Obergefell v. Hodges is about homosexual marriage certificates being honored irrespective of States’ laws on marriage. That homosexual marriages are to be honored on the same level as heterosexuals.

Hence, marriage equality.

In other words, to accomplish equality, they must suppress the ageless institution of marriage between one man and one woman as inerrantly given by God as taught in the timeless infallible Word of God.

Why?

Because certain states have laws on the books that prohibit homosexual marriage and the elite leaders of homosexuality knew that this is a major problem in their pursuit of dominance and control in the United States.

We all know that this homosexual agenda is a clear and present danger to the United States.

How is it a danger?

1. Homosexual marriage re-writes the rules of traditional Biblical marriage as we know it.

2. It is a danger to Christians practicing their faith which brings the convicting power of the gospel.

We must remember Paul’s word in 2 Corinthians 2:14-16.

“Now thanks be to God who always leads us in triumph in Christ, and through us diffuses the fragrance of His knowledge in every place. For we are to God the fragrance of Christ among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing. To the one we are the aroma of death leading to death, and to the other the aroma of life leading to life.”

They are trying to stop this aroma for a long time.

In essence, what 5 justices have accomplished is to give practicing homosexuals a race status by invoking the power of the 14th Amendment.

Homosexuality is not a race. 

Homosexuality is a sin. 

Homosexuals are not a race. 

Homosexuals are people that practice the vile, disgusting, and nasty sin of homosexuality.

This propels polygamy into a race status. This propels pedophilia into a race status. This propels zoophilia into a race status, equally protected by the law.

The moment sin is legal, it brings every illegality into the status of the 14th Amendment. Equal Protection.

Man did not make up marriage. Marriage is the ageless institution from God to one man and one woman.

The argument of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” is a flawed argument for well known monumental reasons.

What the world is telling the child of God to do is when you come to work, leave Jesus and His standards at the door. You are not permitted to live by your Bible.

You are commanded to live by our rules irrespective of your conscience. Respect our rules and laws while we disrespect your moral conscience and God’s law.
The 1st Amendment gives us this protection against governmental tyranny.

Here is the 1st Amendment.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

“Prohibiting the free exercise thereof” is what Judge Bunning did to Kim Davis.

In essence, because there is no law stating that a clerk MUST give a license to homosexuals, the judge legislated from the bench, stating that this is the law of the land, where there is no law made by Congress, and incarcerated Kim Davis for contempt of court. This intimidation tactic was designed to suppress her right to exercise her religious objection to issue a marriage license to practicing homosexuals.

Homosexuality is condemned by God in the Scriptures and there is no need to run references with the exception of Leviticus 18:22 and Romans 1:18-32.

We must also remember the Civil Rights movement was born out of civil disobedience to laws that were already in the books in the states. 

Again, I remind you that there is no law in the books regarding homosexual marriage in the U.S. Constitution or Kentucky law, but in the Civil Rights movement, civil disobedience was warranted because there were laws in the books. Hence, the Civil Rights laws were created by the only law making body in the United States.

Congress.

So how can Kim Davis be illegally tried and unlawfully incarcerated for a law that doesn’t exist?

It’s judicial tyranny.

Finally, the “law of the land” argument is a “phantom law” argument.

Congress can draft and make laws. Not any judge and not the president.

There is no “law of the land” made by Congress for homosexual marriage to be legal in the United States.

Kim Davis did her job and she is to be commended for civil disobedience to a law that doesn’t exist.

I can understand the intent behind “Christian Disobedience.”

Lately BLM (Black Lives Matters) has been approving the killing of police officers, unlawful uprisings to destroy property, and other vicious forms of destruction to make a point.

With the Kim Davis incident, there is no comparison.

She did what Acts 5:29 says, “We rather obey God than man.”

Romans 13 teaches every born again believer to follow the laws of God’s appointed ministers that oversee the orderly activities of man. When the laws of man conflict with the Word of God, we cannot uphold, support, or obey a law of man that clearly violate the Scriptures. Even if it means losing our job, incarceration, or death.

In the 1600’s the puritans came from England to America to avoid religious persecution.

Now this persecution is about to engulf this once great land where freedom was sought. We do not pay enough attention to why they came. We are only interested in turning this once great nation into a land of immorality. For this to happen, morality must now be a thing of the past and anyone that says anything about God or the Bible must be snuffed out.

This only brings the wrath of God on this nation. As Christians, we must guard ourselves from anything that demands the suppression of the right to exercise what we believe in the Word of God.

God would never instruct us to disobey Him and obey the devil. And God would never instruct us to disobey man’s law that is in harmony with God’s Word.

Again, it is not lawful or right to tell Kim Davis to quit her job because she did her job in accordance with the law. As Kim Davis said, she was voted in as an elected official. Only the people that voted her in can vote her out. The judge has taken a page out of persecution, we respond according to Matthew 5:43-48. But we also respond by honoring God and His Word above man’s unjust laws.

We must also remember that the children of Israel perverted justice and changed the commandment of God by upholding their traditions. For this, they are severely judged, even to this day.

Until there is a specific law stating very clearly that a clerk MUST issue a marriage license to homosexuals, and until there is a change in the law from the Kentucky legislators of 402.005 Definition of marriage, civil disobedience is a page out of Acts 5:29 and commendable of the greatest Civil Rights struggle in US history.

We must remember that homosexuals are also liars in accordance with John 8:44.

They will go to great lengths to get a child of God to compromise. It is best to err on the side of the Word of God against the sin of homosexuality than to accommodate the sin of homosexuality.

Man’s temporary persecution is far better than God’s hot displeasure.